Skip to main content

Technology and the humanness of organizations

 

Like, what colour is a conversation with a colleague? All those bits that might not be reflected in the calendar.
The research I undertook for my Professional Doctorate (completed in 2017) explored how technology alters organizational processes and structures. The above quote relates to the use of the Outlook calendar to manage workload in a health clinic.

Some of the findings anticipated the transformation of work that was accelerated by the pandemic and enabled by technology.  For example, I showed how technology transports work across an organization’s usual boundaries of time (9-5) and place (the office).

The affordances of technology (i.e. what it enables) have many positive aspects, such as maintaining delivery of critical services during a global pandemic. Society’s capacity to deliver its core functions was many times greater in 2020 that it was 10 or 50 years earlier. Some impacts were unexpected – such as accelerating the decline in physical newspaper sales because people weren’t going into the office, and some were unwelcome – such as the isolation of workers from their colleagues and support systems. Where these individuals were managing highly complex, stressful and demanding work – such as the critical workers of the pandemic – this may have had negative impacts on their capacity to undertake their role, as well as their health. Consider the following comment from one of the participants (a Psychiatrist):

I mean I love the fact that I can get home in time for tea sometimes and then I can do my notes at home.

One of my conclusions was that, unless implemented in thoughtful ways, technology shifts the workload from something that is held collectively – in a department and regulated by a manager – onto the individual employee who has to manage alone. At the same time – by facilitating mobile and ‘agile’ working – it can disrupt the very team structures and relationships that people rely on to manage the anxiety of complex tasks and high pressure situations.

I think a lot of people would prefer to have more members of staff than more devices and then we wouldn’t have to be superhuman robotic agilely working, going from one patient to the next and writing our notes up in our cars.

The impact will be sector specific and some individuals and teams will be better able to manage change than others. The quality of management is a key factor in how well teams and individuals adjust to transformations in their work.

All change, including technological change, has positive and negative effects. The role of the leader, manager or consultant is to maximize the former and mitigate the latter.

The answer cannot be to undo the multiple benefits afforded by new technologies, but to take time to reflect on the impact of these changes on people, the humanness of organizations, and ultimately on their capacity to deliver effectively for clients, consumers, audiences and service users.

Further reading

Vansina, L. (ed.) (2013). Humanness in Organisations: A Psychodynamic Contribution. London: Karnac Books Ltd.

Waggett, N. 2017. Technology at Work: An Investigation of Technology as a Mediator of Organizational Processes in the Human Services and the Implications for Consultancy Practice. Available via my blog https://unstickwork.blogspot.com/

 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In the age of the smart machine (again)

In the age of the smart machine  How can we benefit from the opportunities of digitization and AI in ways that improve both the provision of services and the experience of those working in them? As a way of reflecting on the current imperative to benefit from the role-out of AI across business and public services, I have been re-reading Shoshana Zuboff’s seminal study ‘In the age of the smart machine’ . This book, published in 1988, traced the implementation of an earlier generation of computer technologies. Whilst AI has many different characteristics, opportunities and potential risks, I think Zuboff’s analysis continues to have relevance and can provide insight into what is happening today.  Automate or informate A key distinction Zuboff makes is between technology used to automate work processes or to informate them.   If technology is used only to automate work:  it can reduce skill levels, and dampen the urge towards more participatory and decentralized...
Post a Comment
Read more

Digital transformations

This paper has been published as Waggett, N. (2025). Digital transformations: Exploring the human-technology constellation in our entangled organisations. Organisational & Social Dynamics 25(1) 52–72 (2025)  Organisational and Social Dynamics,  25, 52-72. doi: 10.33212/osd.v25n1.2025.52   ABSTRACT Work, organisations, and society have been transformed by digital technologies. Information and communication technologies are increasingly important to the management and delivery of human services. Significant sums are invested with the expectation that new technology will drive positive changes such as improving service user experience, efficiency, and outcomes. Sometimes the promises of technology are not fully realised. As researchers and practitioners in organisational and social dynamics it is important to understand how these technologies are affecting the ways in which we organise, communicate, and relate.  In this article I explore one aspect of this dynamic, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Defining the Primary Task (Visualizing Organisational Dynamics Series #1)

What is the one thing that your organisation (company, team, service) must do in order to survive and thrive? Is that what you are actually doing?   Most people working in an organisation, or leading it, will be familiar with the feeling of having to do too much with too little resources. Phrases such as ‘having to keep all the balls in the air’ and ‘I need to keep all the plates spinning’ suggest a person juggling multiple tasks, responsibilities, or commitments simultaneously. This is stressful for the individual or team and often not very effective as it is hard to determine which of the ‘plates’ is the priority and therefore deserves greater time or resources. Prioritization is crucial to effective planning and clarity on which tasks are likely to produce most gains is important for job satisfaction.   When we are in the middle of a whirl of competing demands, or facing deadlines and targets, it can feel impossible to determine what is most important. Most likely w...
Post a Comment
Read more